Even though combustion ion chromatography (CIC) is regarded as an up-and-coming sample preparation and analysis technique, the basic process behind CIC has already existed for many years. This blog post introduces the history of this technique, the working principle, and some applications for CIC.

The beginnings of combustion IC (CIC)

Our previous blogs about the history of Metrohm ion chromatography (Parts 1–3) outlined how IC has become one of the most used analytical techniques for the analysis of inorganic anions and cations in a wide variety of aqueous media.
 

History of Metrohm IC – Part 1

History of Metrohm IC – Part 2

History of Metrohm IC – Part 3


In the mid-1970s the impact of organic halogens and sulfur became a topic of intensified focus, as these compounds were shown to increase ozone destruction and adversely impact the environment [1]. In addition, they are corrosive and can threaten human health during water treatment processes [2,3].

Most organic halogens are not water-soluble, therefore decomposition is necessary as a first analytical step [46]. Using combustion as a sample preparation method to decompose such compounds and to enable subsequent sulfur determination [6] in a closed system (i.e., «combustion bomb») under pressurized oxygen atmosphere began in 1881. In 1955, Schöninger developed the first convenient handling of the combustion process—the so-called «oxygen flask» [79].

The basic principle of Schöninger-based analytical methods is to burn a certain amount of sample in oxygen-rich atmosphere. The resulting gases are bubbled through an absorber solution which is then transferred to the analytical instrument for measurement (commonly microcoloumetric titration) [2,5,7]. Between samples, the container must be cleaned extensively to avoid cross-contamination [7]. However, these methods did not have the possibility to be automated. Over time, the once dangerous procedure was modified to be much safer. Still, the manual process of preparing samples with extensive rinsing steps in between remained cumbersome and time-consuming.

Around the same time, pyrohydrolysis was established for analytical purposes by Warf [10,11] as «high temperature hydrolysis» to measure halogens, boron, and sulfur especially in geological samples [12]. As IC was already established as a highly sensitive technique for measuring halogens and sulfur, a combination of combustion with IC was introduced as a possibility for fast, accurate, and sensitive multi-element analysis. High sensitivities could already be achieved by combining the oxygen-bomb combustion method with IC [13], but pyrohydrolysis with combustion ovens enabled development of fully automated procedures [14].

The combustion process

The overall combustion process for major application fields such as AOX (adsorbable organic halogens), halogen, or sulfur determination in various matrices was improved upon, culminating in a complete inline connection of automated combustion ovens. In this automatic setup (Figure 1), the sample (liquid, solid, or gaseous) is introduced into the oven and subsequently combusted at high temperatures in a water/oxygen environment. The combustion gases are continuously fed through an absorber vessel. There, they are passed through an aqueous absorber solution where the volatile halogens and sulfur are captured and oxidized.

Classically, the absorber solution was analyzed using colorimetric titration in the case of AOX (e.g., ISO 9562:2004, DIN 38414-18:2019, or EPA 1650) or sulfur (e.g., ASTM C816-85 or [5]), or via potentiometric titration with ion-selective electrodes, e.g., for fluoride [5]. However, combining the combustion module with an IC revolutionized the field as detailed information about the analytes was now possible [15]. Halogens and sulfur are quantified individually, and additionally, analysts get fluoride results (DIN 38409-59) – a parameter which the classical techniques had trouble with.

Figure 1. This simplified schematic depicts the process behind combustion ion chromatography.

The combustion instrumentation

Metrohm ion chromatographs were successfully connected to different vendors’ combustion units (Figure 2). Even though these combinations were successful and the application needs were fulfilled, Metrohm detected an increasing need for an all-in-one solution from the market. Therefore, in 2012, the Metrohm Combustion Ion Chromatography (CIC) setup was introduced (Figure 3). This combination offered a single-supplier solution completely supported by Metrohm. The single software control made this already efficient automated combustion solution even easier to use.

Figure 2. Combination of Metrohm IC with combustion units from MultiTek (L) and Mitsubishi (R).
Figure 3. Metrohm CIC with the Combustion Oven from Analytik Jena equipped with a sample introduction unit (autosampler, Auto Boat Drive for liquid or solid samples, or the LPG/GSS module for gases and liquefied petroleum gases), the 920 Absorber Module and the 930 Compact IC Flex from Metrohm.

An alternative Metrohm CIC setup was introduced to the market in 2021, utilizing a combustion oven developed by Trace Elemental Instruments (TEI) (Figure 4). With these various CIC systems, Metrohm is confident to offer the perfect fit for different application needs and market demands.

Figure 4. Metrohm CIC with the Combustion Oven (TEI) includes a specific sample introduction unit (Boat introduction module quartz or ceramic) for manual introduction of a solid or liquid sample. The system can be extended with a specific autosampler for solids or liquids, gases, as well as the unique introduction for direct injection of liquids (manual or automated).

While the combustion ovens are still manufactured by Analytik Jena or Trace Elemental Instruments, respectively, the full CIC system is handled by application and service teams from Metrohm. All of this combined with the implementation of Dosinos and intelligent Dosing Units for controlled liquid handling made CIC ideal as a routine method for the petrochemical industry and more. 

Simplified CIC analysis with Metrohm

No internal standard is required due to the full liquid balance by the Dosinos in the 920 Absorber Module, which controls all liquid streams (e.g., water supply for the combustion, absorber solution, and for rinsing). They also enable Inline Matrix Elimination for removal of the hydrogen peroxide used as absorber solution and Partial-loop Injection for easier analysis of more difficult samples.


Learn more about Metrohm Inline Sample Preparation (MISP) possibilities for difficult sample matrices here.

Metrohm Inline Sample Preparation and intelligent injection techniques


When working with a large variety of samples, special method development is no longer necessary with the application of flame sensor technology from Analytik Jena. The light intensity is registered and translated into specific sample boat movements in order to conduct the combustion in minimal time.

For critical samples with a high content of fluoride or alkali and alkaline earth metals, the ceramic tube from Trace Elemental Instruments is highly recommended. The ceramic is resistant to such sample types which provoke devitrification in a quartz setup.

Application examples: determination of sulfur and halogen compounds with Metrohm CIC

Petroleum/refining industry

Low-quality petroleum may contain significant quantities of sulfur. During combustion, this produces sulfur dioxide (SO2) which contributes to air pollution. Sulfur compounds contained in petroleum are also a problem for oil refineries and internal combustion engines—they lead to corrosion and stress cracking and can poison catalysts (e.g., those used in catalytic reforming). To prevent this, sulfur must first be removed via hydrodesulfurization [16]. The standard DIN EN 228 sets a maximum of 10 mg/kg for the sulfur content in automotive fuels.

Sulfur is not the only analyte of interest for the petroleum industry. Halides (F-, Cl-, and Br-) also contribute to corrosion and must therefore be removed from petroleum through desalting processes [17]. The analysis of halogens and sulfur via CIC in liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is shown in the chromatogram below (Figure 5).

Figure 5. 50 µL of a synthetic butane sample has been analyzed for its halogen and sulfur content using Metrohm CIC with Analytik Jena. 1. Fluorine: 26.33 mg/kg, 2. Chlorine: 17.23 mg/kg, 3. Nitrite: not quantified, 4. Bromine: 37.83 mg/kg, 5. Nitrate: not quantified and 6. Sulfur: 13.08 mg/kg.

Find out more information about this analysis in our free Application Note below.

Halogens and sulfur in LPG according to ASTM D7994

Organic halogens – «forever chemicals»

Organic halogen compounds can enter the environment when they are being manufactured, used, or disposed of [4]. They can be detected in the air, in water, and in living organisms. Such fluorinated compounds are commonly known as either PFASs (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances) or «forever chemicals», and their detrimental effect on human health is described at length in scientific literature and the news. This classification covers several thousands of chemicals and determining individual substances from the list is time-consuming and requires costly instrumentation. Therefore, some laboratories take a non-targeted screening approach instead to monitor the overall presence of these manmade chemicals.

Organic fluorinated compounds, such as PFASs in particular, can be easily monitored using non-targeted AOF (adsorbable organic fluorine) analysis by CIC. The new EPA draft method 1621 released in April 2022 describes a validated method for comprehensive AOF analysis using combustion ion chromatography. Find out more about this analysis in our free White Paper at the end of the article.

Compliance with international standards

New applications for CIC are popping up everywhere with the rising need to monitor halogens and sulfur in several industries. As CIC has now matured into a reliable, automated analysis technique for these substances, it has become more commonly used to fulfill the analytical requirements of several international standards. A summary of recent standards is given in Table 1.

Table 1. Metrohm CIC: Compliant with official standards

Standard Title
DIN 38409-59 (Draft 2022) Determination of adsorbable organically bound fluorine, chlorine, bromine and iodine (AOF, AOCl, AOBr, AOI) after combustion and ion chromatographic measurement 
EPA Method 1621 (Draft 2022) Screening Method for the Determination of Adsorbable Organic Fluorine (AOF) in Aqueous Matrices by Combustion Ion Chromatography (CIC)
DIN EN 17813:2022 (2022) Environmental matrices - Halogens and sulfur by oxidative pyrohydrolytic combustion followed by ion chromatography detection and complementary determination methods
ASTM D7359-18 (2018) Standard Test Method for Total Fluorine, Chlorine and Sulfur in Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Their Mixtures by Oxidative Pyrohydrolytic Combustion followed by Ion Chromatography Detection (Combustion Ion Chromatography, CIC)
UOP 991-17 (2017) Trace Chloride, Fluoride, and Bromide in Liquid Organics by Combustion Ion Chromatography (CIC)
ASTM D7994-17 (2017) Standard Test Method for Total Fluorine, Chlorine, and Sulfur in Liquid Petroleum Gas (LPG) by Oxidative Pyrohydrolytic Combustion Followed by Ion Chromatography Detection (Combustion Ion Chromatography-CIC)
ASTM D5987-96 (2017) Standard Test Method for Total Fluorine in Coal and Coke by Pyrohydrolytic Extraction and Ion Selective Electrode or Ion Chromatograph Methods

Summary

So much has happened in the past decade since Metrohm CIC was first brought to the market! Combustion IC has already become established as a routine analysis method in many labs. The addition of Metrohm Inline Sample Preparation Techniques has increased the degree of automation, positively impacting accuracy, handling, and sample throughput. With a single supplier and software solution, organically bound halogens and sulfur can now be determined directly in a wide variety of sample matrices in various physical states (solid, liquid, or gaseous).

[1] Simpson, W. R.; Brown, S. S.; Saiz-Lopez, A.; Thornton, J. A.; von Glasow, R. Tropospheric Halogen Chemistry: Sources, Cycling, and Impacts. Chem. Rev. 2015115 (10), 4035–4062. DOI:10.1021/cr5006638

[2] McKinnon, L. M. AOX as a Regulatory Parameter; A Scientific Review of AOX Toxicity and Environmental Fate; British Columbia Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks, Canada, 1994.

[3] Kampa, M.; Castanas, E. Human Health Effects of Air Pollution. Environ. Pollut. Barking Essex 1987 2008151 (2), 362–367. DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.012

[4] Mazor, L. Analytical Chemistry of Organic Halogen Compounds, 1st ed.; International series of monographs in analytical chemistry; v. 58; 1975.

[5] Ma, T. S. Elemental Analysis, Organic Compounds. In Encyclopedia of Physical Science and Technology (Third Edition); Meyers, R. A., Ed.; Academic Press: New York, 2003; pp 393–405. DOI:10.1016/B0-12-227410-5/00220-9

[6] Barin, J. S.; de Maraes Flores, Erico Marlon; Knapp, G. Trends in Sample Preparation Using Combustion Techniques. In Trends in Sample Preparation (Marco A. Z. Arruda eds.); Nova Science Publishers, Inc., 2007; pp 53–82.

[7] Schöniger, W. The present status of organic elemental microanalysis. Pure Appl. Chem. 197021 (4), 497–512. DOI:10.1351/pac197021040497

[8] Schöniger, W. Die mikroanalytische Schnellbestimmung von Halogenen und Schwefel in organischen Verbindungen. Microchim. Acta 195644 (4), 869–876. DOI:10.1007/BF01262130

[9] Fung, Y. S.; Dao, K. L. Oxygen Bomb Combustion Ion Chromatography for Elemental Analysis of Heteroatoms in Fuel and Wastes Development. Anal. Chim. Acta 1995315 (3), 347–355. DOI:10.1016/0003-2670(95)00317-S

[10] Mishra, V. G.; Jeyakumar, S. Pyrohydrolysis, a Clean Separation Method for Separating Non-Metals Directly from Solid Matrix. Open Access J. Sci. 20182 (6), 389–393. DOI:10.15406/oajs.2018.02.00103

[11] Warf, J. C.; Cline, W. D.; Tevebaugh, R. D. Pyrohydrolysis in Determination of Fluoride and Other Halides. Anal. Chem. 195426 (2), 342–346. DOI:10.1021/ac60086a019

[12] Evans, K. L.; Tarter, J. G.; Moore, C. B. Pyrohydrolytic-Ion Chromatographic Determination of Fluorine, Chlorine, and Sulfur in Geological Samples. Anal. Chem. 198153 (6), 925–928. DOI:10.1021/ac00229a050

[13] Zhang, S.; Zhao, T.; Wang, J.; Qu, X.; Chen, W.; Han, Y. Determination of Fluorine, Chlorine and Bromine in Household Products by Means of Oxygen Bomb Combustion and Ion Chromatography. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 201351 (1), 65–69. DOI:10.1093/chromsci/bms108

[14] Pereira, L. S. F.; Pedrotti, M. F.; Vecchia, P. D.; Pereira, J. S. F.; Flores, E. M. M. A Simple and Automated Sample Preparation System for Subsequent Halogens Determination: Combustion Followed by Pyrohydrolysis. Anal. Chim. Acta 20181010, 29–36. DOI:10.1016/j.aca.2018.01.034

[15] Peng, B.; Wu, D.; Lai, J.; Xiao, H.; Li, P. Simultaneous Determination of Halogens (F, Cl, Br, and I) in Coal Using Pyrohydrolysis Combined with Ion Chromatography. Fuel 201294, 629–631. DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2011.12.011

[16] Pfahler, B. Halogen-Containing Hydrocarbons from Petroleum and Natural Gas. In Literature Resources; Advances in Chemistry; American Chemical Society, 1954; Vol. 10, pp 381–394. DOI:10.1021/ba-1954-0010.ch040

[17] Al-Otaibi, M. B.; Elkamel, A.; Nassehi, V.; Abdul-Wahab, S. A. A Computational Intelligence Based Approach for the Analysis and Optimization of a Crude Oil Desalting and Dehydration Process. Energy Fuels 200519 (6), 2526–2534. DOI:10.1021/ef050132j

Adsorbable organic fluorine (AOF) – a sum parameter for non-targeted screening of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) in waters

Click here to download

The prevalence of per- and polyfluorinated alkyl substances (PFASs) and other perfluorinated compounds (PFCs) that persist and accumulate in the environment (as well as in our own bodies) is becoming an increasing international concern. PFASs are a class of nearly 10,000 different compounds more commonly known as «forever chemicals» due to their stability. They are a challenge to monitor individually and quantify in low concentrations. Expensive analytical instrumentation and experience is required to determine a small selection of individual PFASs, and such analyses can be time-consuming and difficult to validate. A large fraction of synthetic organofluorine substances is assumed to be covered by the sum of all adsorbable fluorine in waters (AOF). Measuring AOF with combustion ion chromatography (CIC) is simpler and faster than targeted analysis methods, and also more sensitive than total fluorine (TF) determination (comprising all organic and inorganic F). Measurement of AOF in water samples as an initial screening step gives a fast overview of the actual amount of organic fluorinated compounds present. This can be followed by targeted analyses of individual PFASs if indicated by higher AOF concentrations.

Author
Reber

Iris Reber

Sr. Product Specialist Ion Chromatography (Combustion IC, VoltIC)
Metrohm International Headquarters, Herisau, Switzerland

Contact